Bawden, David, and Lyn Robinson. Introduction to Information Science. Chicago: Neal-Schuman, 2012.

Case, Donald O. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior. 3rd ed. Bingley, UK: Emerald, 2012.
Fisher, Karen E., Sanda Erdelez, and Lynne (E. F.) McKechnie, eds. Theories of Information Behavior. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2005.
Leckie, Gloria J., Lisa M. Given, and John E. Buschman, eds. Critical Theory for Library and Information Science: Exploring the Social from Across the Disciplines. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries
Unlimited, 2010.

Ontologies.
Bates (2010).
McGann (2013).
Ma (2012).
Lowe (2001).
Almeida (2013).
Heur et al. (2013).
Bates, Marcia J. “An Operational Definition of the Information Disciplines.” Paper presented at the iConference, Urbana–Champaign, IL, February 2010. http://pages.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/pdf/Contribution512-1.pdf
McGann, Jerome. “Philology in a New Key.” Critical Inquiry 39, no. 2 (2013): 327–346. doi:10.1086/668528.
Ma, Lai. “Meanings of Information: The Assumptions and Research Consequences of Three Foundational LIS Theories.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, no. 4 (2012): 716–723. doi:10.1002/asi.21711.
Lowe, E. J. “Recent Advances in Metaphysics.” Paper presented at the International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems, Ogonquit, ME, October 2001. http://www.cs.vassar.edu/~weltyc/fois/fois-2001/keynote/.
Almeida, Mauricio Barcellos. “Revisiting Ontologies: A Necessary Clarification.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, no. 8 (2013): 1682–1693. doi:10.1002/asi.22861.
Heur, Bas van, Loet Leydesdorff, and Sally Wyatt. “Turning to Ontology in STS? Turning to STS through ‘Ontology’.” Social Studies of Science 43, no. 3 (2013): 341–362. doi:10.1177/0306312712458144.

Epistemologies.
Bates (2005).
Hjørland (2005).
Talja et al. (2005).
Proctor (1998).
Guo et al. (in press).
Räsänen & Nyce (2013).
Bates, Marcia J. “An Introduction to Metatheories, Theories, and Models.” In Theories of Information Behavior, edited by Karen E. Fisher, Sanda Erdelez, and Lynne (E. F.) McKechnie, 1–24. Medford, NJ: Information Today, 2005.
Hjørland, Birger. “Empiricism, Rationalism and Positivism in Library and Information Science.” Journal of Documentation 61, no. 1 (2005): 130–155. doi:10.1108/00220410510578050.
Talja, Sanna, Kimmo Tuominen, and Reijo Savolainen. “‘Isms’ in Information Science: Constructivism, Collectivism and Constructionism.” Journal of Documentation 61, no. 1 (2005): 79–101.
Proctor, James D. “The Social Construction of Nature: Relativist Accusations, Pragmatist and Critical Realist Responses.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88, no. 3 (1998): 352–376. doi:10.1111/0004-5608.00105.
Guo, Guang, Yilan Fu, Hedwig Lee, Tianji Cai, Kathleen Mullan Harris, and Yi Li. “Genetic Bio-Ancestry and Social Construction of Racial Classification in Social Surveys in the Contemporary United States.” Demography (in press). Accessed September 19, 2013. doi:10.1007/s13524-013-0242-0.
Räsänen, Minna, and James M. Nyce. “The Raw Is Cooked: Data in Intelligence Practice.” Science, Technology & Human Values 38, no. 5 (2013): 655–677. doi:10.1177/0162243913480049.

Qualities.
Stanford (1998).
Zeitlyn (2012).
Cibangu (2013).
* Jones (2013).
* Kistner (in press).
* Millerand et al. (2013).
Stanford, Michael. “Causes and Explanations”; and “Explanations in the Social Sciences and in History.” In An Introduction to the Philosophy of History, 85–144. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 1998.
Zeitlyn, David. “Anthropology in and of the Archives: Possible Futures and Contingent Pasts; Archives as Anthropological Surrogates.” Annual Review of Anthropology no. 41 (2012): 461–480.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145721.
Cibangu, Sylvain K. “A Memo of Qualitative Research for Information Science: Toward Theory Construction.” Journal of Documentation 69, no. 2 (2013): 194–213. doi:10.1108/00220411311300048.
* Jones, Claire L. “Instruments of Medical Information: The Rise of the Medical Trade Catalog in Britain, 1750–1914.” Technology and Culture 54, no. 3 (2013): 563–599. doi:10.1353/tech.2013.0114.
* Kistner, Kelly. “‘A Word Factory Was Wanted’: Organizational Objectivity in the Making of the Oxford English Dictionary.” Social Studies of Science (in press). Accessed September 19, 2013.
doi:10.1177/0306312713496603.
* Millerand, Florence, David Ribes, Karen S. Baker, and Geoffrey C. Bowker. “Making an Issue out of a Standard: Storytelling Practices in a Scientific Community.” Science, Technology & Human Values 38, no. 1 (2013): 7–43. doi:10.1177/0162243912437221.

Communities.
Derrida, Jacques. “Archive Fever: A Freudian Impression.” Diacritics 25, no. 5 (1995): 9–63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/465144.
Harris, Verne. “Jacques Derrida Meets Nelson Mandela: Archival Ethics at the Endgame.” Archival Science 11, no. 1–2 (2011): 113–124. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10502-010-9111-4.
Flinn, Andrew. “Archival Activism: Independent and Community-led Archives, Radical Public History, and the Heritage Professions.” InterActions 7, no. 2 (2011). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9pt2490x.
Harris, Verne. “Nelson Mandela, Memory, and the Work of Justice.” InterActions 8, no. 2 (2012). http://escholarship.org/uc/item/4ng874xp.
Yaco, Sonia, and Beatriz Betancourt Hardy. “Historians, Archivists, and Social Activism: Benefits and Costs.” Archival Science 13, no. 2–3 (2012): 253–272. doi: 10.1007/s10502-012-9187-0.
Cook, Terry. “Evidence, Memory, Identity, and Community: Four Shifting Archival Paradigms.” Archival Science 13, no. 2–3 (2013): 95–120. doi:10.1007/s10502-012-9180-7.

Quantities.
Pattuelli & Rubinow (in press).
Ruggles (in press).
Gooding et al. (in press).
* Schleifer (2013).
* Madden et al. (2013).
* Latapy et al. (2013).
Pattuelli, Cristina, and Sara Rubinow. “The Knowledge Organization of DBpedia: A Case Study.” Journal of Documentation 69, no. 6 (in press).
Ruggles, Steven. “Big Microdata for Population Research.” Demography (in press). Accessed September 19, 2013. doi:10.1007/s13524-013-0240-2.
Gooding, Paul, Melissa Terras, and Claire Warwick. “The Myth of the New: Mass Digitization, Distant Reading, and the Future of the Book.” Literary and Linguistic Computing (in press). Accessed September 19, 2013. doi:10.1093/llc/fqt051.
* Schleifer, David. “Categories Count: Trans Fat Labeling as a Technique of Corporate Governance.” Social Studies of Science 43, no. 1 (2013): 54–77. doi:10.1177/0306312712461573.
* Madden, Amy, Ian Ruthven, and David McMenemy. “A Classification Scheme for Content Analyses of YouTube Video Comments.” Journal of Documentation 69, no. 5 (2013): 693–714. doi:10.1108/JD-06-2012-0078.
* Latapy, Matthieu, Clémence Magnien, and Raphaël Fournier. “Quantifying Paedophile Activity in a Large P2P System.” Information Processing & Management 49, no. 1 (2013): 248–263.
doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2012.02.008.

Societies.
Beer & Burrows (2013).
Veinot & Williams (2012).
Caers et al. (2013).
* Flores & James (2013).
* Young & Quan-Haase (2013).
* Brubaker et al. (2013).
Beer, David, and Roger Burrows. “Popular Culture, Digital Archives and the New Social Life of Data.” Theory, Culture & Society 30, no. 4 (2013): 47–71. doi:10.1177/0263276413476542.
Veinot, Tiffany C., and Kate Williams. “Following the ‘Community’ Thread from Sociology to Information Behavior and Informatics: Uncovering Theoretical Continuities and Research Opportunities.”
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63, no. 5 (2012): 847–864.
Caers, Ralf, Tim De Feyter, Marijke De Couck, Talia Stough, Claudia Vigna, and Cind Du Bois. “Facebook: A Literature Review.” New Media & Society 15, no. 6 (2013): 982–1002. doi:10.1177/1461444813488061.
* Flores, Andrea, and Carrie James. “Morality and Ethics Behind the Screen: Young People’s Perspectives on Digital Life.” New Media & Society 15, no. 6 (2013): 834–852. doi:10.1177/1461444812462842.
* Young, Alyson Leigh, and Anabel Quan-Haase. “Privacy Protection Strategies on Facebook.” Information, Communication & Society 16, no. 4 (2013): 479–500. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2013.777757.
* Brubaker, Jed R., Gillian R. Hayes, and Paul Dourish. “Beyond the Grave: Facebook as a Site for the Expansion of Death and Mourning.” The Information Society 29, no. 3 (2013): 152–163.
doi:10.1080/01972243.2013.777300.

Cultures.
McKechnie et al. (2012).
Ruppert et al. (2013).
Hughey & Daniels (2013).
* Anderson (2013).
* Radford et al. (2012).
* Valtysson (2012).
McKechnie, Lynne (E. F.), Lucia Cedeira Serantes, and Cameron Hoffman. “Dancing Around the Edges: The Use of Postmodern Approaches in Information Behaviour Research as Evident in the Published Proceedings of the Biennial ISIC Conferences, 1996–2010.” Information Research 17, no. 4 (2012).
http://informationr.net/ir/17-4/paper548.html#.Ujy2biQpdIs.
Ruppert, Evelyn, John Law, and Mike Savage. “Reassembling Social Science Methods: The Challenge of Digital Devices.” Theory, Culture & Society 30, no. 4 (2013): 22–46. doi:10.1177/0263276413484941.
Hughey, Matthew W., and Jessie Daniels. “Racist Comments at Online News Sites: A Methodological Dilemma for Discourse Analysis.” Media, Culture & Society 35, no. 3 (2013): 332–347.
doi:10.1177/0163443712472089.
* Anderson, Warwick. “The Case of the Archive.” Critical Inquiry 39, no. 3 (2013): 532–547. doi:10.1086/670044.
Reclaiming the Voice of the Deaccessioned Book.” Journal of Documentation 68, no. 2 (2012): 254–267.
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00220411211209221.
* Valtysson, Bjarki. “Europeana: The Digital Construction of Europe’s Collective Memory.” Information,
Communication & Society 15, no. 2 (2012): 151–170. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.586433.

Designs.
Feldman (2013).
Gossen & Nürnberger (2013).
Shilton (2013).
* Muralidharan & Hearst (2012).
* Pera & Ng (2013).
* Gracy et al. (2013).
Feldman, Ronen. “Techniques and Applications for Sentiment Analysis.” Communications of the ACM 56, no.
4 (2013): 82. doi:10.1145/2436256.2436274.
Gossen, Tatiana, and Andreas Nürnberger. “Specifics of Information Retrieval for Young Users: A
Survey.” Information Processing & Management 49, no. 4 (2013): 739–756. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2012.12.006.
Shilton, Katie. “Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design.” Science, Technology & Human Values 38, no. 3
(2013): 374–397. doi:10.1177/0162243912436985.
* Muralidharan, Aditi, and Marti A. Hearst. “Supporting Exploratory Text Analysis in Literature Study.”
Literary and Linguistic Computing 28, no. 2 (2012): 283–295. doi:10.1093/llc/fqs044.
* Pera, Maria S., and Yiu-Kai Ng. “A Group Recommender for Movies Based on Content Similarity and
Popularity.” Information Processing & Management 49, no. 3 (2013): 673–687. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2012.07.007.
* Gracy, Karen F., Marcia Lei Zeng, and Laurence Skirvin. “Exploring Methods to Improve Access to
Music Resources by Aligning Library Data with Linked Data: A Report of Methodologies and Preliminary
Findings.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, no. 10 (2013): 2078–2099.
doi:10.1002/asi.22914.

Evaluations.
Lamont (2012).
Mulligan (2013).
Sud & Thelwall (in press).
* Sugimoto & Cronin (2013).
* Safón (in press).
* Leydesdorff et al. (2013).
Lamont, Michèle. “Toward a Comparative Sociology of Valuation and Evaluation.” Annual Review of
Sociology 38, no. 1 (2012): 201–221. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120022.
Mulligan, Adrian, Louise Hall, and Ellen Raphael. “Peer Review in a Changing World: An International
Study Measuring the Attitudes of Researchers.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and
Technology 64, no. 1 (2013): 132–161. doi:10.1002/asi.22798.
Sud, Pardeep, and Mike Thelwall. “Evaluating Altmetrics.” Scientometrics (in press). Accessed September 19,
2013. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-1117-2.
* Sugimoto, Cassidy R., and Blaise Cronin. “Citation Gamesmanship: Testing for Evidence of Ego Bias in
Peer Review.” Scientometrics 95, no. 3 (2013): 851–862. doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0845-z.
* Safón, Vicente. “What Do Global University Rankings Really Measure? The Search for the X Factor and
the X Entity.” Scientometrics (in press). Accessed September 19, 2013. doi:10.1007/s11192-013-0986-8.
* Leydesdorff, Loet, Ping Zhou, and Lutz Bornmann. “How Can Journal Impact Factors Be Normalized
Across Fields of Science? An Assessment in Terms of Percentile Ranks and Fractional Counts.” Journal of the
American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, no. 1 (2013): 96–107. doi:10.1002/asi.22765.